Consistency before cleverness
When a child is struggling, the adult response should become simpler and more predictable — not more elaborate.
A shared approach does not mean every member of staff recites the same sentence. It means adults agree the basics: keep everyone safe, lower unnecessary demand, stay connected, use clear boundaries and help the child return to learning.
1. Before — catch the wobble early
Look for the child’s early signs: going very quiet, speeding up, becoming silly, arguing over small things, tearing work, hovering near an adult, hiding or repeatedly asking what happens next.
With younger children, concrete language usually beats questions about feelings. You can name what you notice without requiring the child to explain it.
2. During — fewer words, clear safety
When a child is very upset, this is not the moment for a lesson about choices. Keep language short enough to process.
Acceptance does not mean accepting unsafe behaviour. If someone could be hurt, act according to the school’s safeguarding, behaviour and safety procedures. Relational practice is not passive practice.
3. After — reconnect, then make sense of it
Do not rush straight from distress into a forensic debrief. First check that the child is ready to think and talk. For younger children, drawing, objects, simple choices or the adult gently reconstructing the sequence may work better than open questions.
Repair should reconnect the child to the community and the expectation — not leave them carrying shame into the next lesson.
Make it work when the usual adult is absent
- Pick one recurring moment — arrival, carpet time, transition, correction, independent work or lunchtime return.
- Agree what adults are trying to achieve in that moment: safety, connection, reduced demand, return to learning.
- Agree the few words and actions that help — and what tends to make things worse.
- Make sure lunchtime, wraparound and supply staff know the essentials where appropriate.
- Review what actually changed after two weeks rather than assuming the approach worked.
Evidence and limits
This resource is informed by relational and attachment-aware practice, PACE principles and evidence on behaviour, self-regulation and whole-school consistency. The evidence base for “trauma-informed” school approaches is still developing and the term is used inconsistently. Treat this as a practical relational tool, not a claim that one set of phrases is a proven intervention.
- Education Endowment Foundation — Improving Behaviour in Schools.
- Education Endowment Foundation — evidence on metacognition and self-regulated learning.
- Golding & Hughes — PACE / attachment-focused relational practice.
If the same behaviour keeps defeating the same systems, change the lens.
Braythorpe works with schools on what may be sitting underneath behaviour — attachment, felt safety, regulation, care experience and the adult practice around it.
Explore support for schools →Speak to Dave.
If this guide has helped but your situation doesn’t fit neatly into a page, send me an email. Tell me what’s happening and I’ll point you towards the most useful next step.